- when one item absorbs the taste of another item, it then takes on the laws of that sacrifice (Vayikra 6:20)
- if a sanctified item comes into contact with a sacrifice, it becomes limited by the same things as the sacrificed
- thus if the sacrifice becomes disqualified, the item is also disqualified
- thus if the sacrifice is valid, the item can only be eaten when/where the sacrifice can be eaten
- the Gemara asks what to do if the prohibition to eat the item is a mitzvah lo ta'aseh, a negative commandment, but eating the item is a mitzvah aseh, a positive commandment
- should we apply the principal aseh docheh lo ta'aseh, performing a positive mitzvah pushes aside a negative mitzvah
- Rava says that this does not apply in the times of the Temple
- there are punishments for transgressions but no punishments for neglecting to perform a mitzvah
- Rabbi Nassim Ga'on says that this rule automatically applies in prohibitions but not when a positive mitzvah is blocking it
- Ramban says that performing positive mitzvot is based on the love of G-d while negative mitzvot are based on the fear of G-d, and love is greater than fear
- no one explained why this rule would not apply in the Temple; it is assumed that the Temple service was restrictive and limits more lenient rules
I began Daf Yomi (Koren translation) in August of 2012 with the help of an online group that is now defunct. This blog is intended to help me structure and focus my thoughts as I grapple with the text. I am happy to connect with others who are interested in the social and halachic implications of our oral tradition. Respectful input is welcome.
Thursday, 19 July 2018
Zevachim 97: Positive/Negative Mitzvot, Absorption of Taste and of Rules
Brief notes on today's daf:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment