- the rabbis continue to discuss the sacrifice of birds
- they consider the consequences when a bird is slaughtered in different places, in different ways
- sometimes the rabbis consider birds to be carcasses, which are forbidden to eat
- A new Mishna is introduced:
- the rabbis disagree about a bird pinched properly but found to be a treifa (forbidden for another reason, for example, it is injured and will die within a year)
- Rabbi Meir says an olive bulk of the meat does not create ritual impurity
- Rabbi Yehuda says its status is like any other carcass of an unslaughtered kosher bird, and it imparts ritual impurity when eaten
- Rabbi Meir says that his own opinion is inferred a fortiori - the slaughter of an animal purifies it from its impurity/ its status as a carcass
- If we agree that slaughter renders a treifa bird pure, we can also assume that pinching also renders a bird offering fit regarding consumption - and thus it should be purified as well
- Rabbi Yosei says that we cannot extend this derivation to pinching
- This is because of a principle: a halacha derived by an a fortiori inference is no more stringent than the source from which it is derived
I began Daf Yomi (Koren translation) in August of 2012 with the help of an online group that is now defunct. This blog is intended to help me structure and focus my thoughts as I grapple with the text. I am happy to connect with others who are interested in the social and halachic implications of our oral tradition. Respectful input is welcome.
Thursday, 21 June 2018
Zevachim 69: Slaughter vs. Pinching
A brief note about today's daf:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment