- we set aside our first fruits, the ma'aser sheni, the second tithe, after first tithes have been held for the priests and the leviim
- the second tithe is taken to Jerusalem by the owner
- if there is too much to carry, the fruit can be traded or redeemed for food that will be eaten in Jerusalem
- Steinsaltz sees the conversation among rabbis as based on a fundamental question: how do we perform these mitzvot when the Temple is no longer standing?
- The Gemara looks to the laws regarding redemption of a first born animal that is brought to the Temple as an offering, the bechor
- Can there be holiness if the holiness of the Temple no longer exists?
- Perhaps the holiness of Eretz Yisrael and the holiness of Jerusalem are the same
- Tosafot: if the Temple takes the holiness away from HaAretz, then it would take the holiness away from Jerusalem
- The Rambam: even if the holiness of HaAretz is taken away, the holiness of Jerusalem cannot be removed because it comes from the presence of G-d
- When the second Temple was rebuilt with the return of the Jews, holiness was centred in that Temple
- Similarly, HaAretz derives its holiness from Jerusalem
- Thus the rabbis teach us that holiness can last forever
- This helps us to understand the rabbis apologetic stance regarding blood being poured in the wrong way; the altar being imperfect, etc.
I began Daf Yomi (Koren translation) in August of 2012 with the help of an online group that is now defunct. This blog is intended to help me structure and focus my thoughts as I grapple with the text. I am happy to connect with others who are interested in the social and halachic implications of our oral tradition. Respectful input is welcome.
Tuesday, 12 June 2018
Zevachim 60: The Origin and Nature of Holiness
Some brief points from today's daf:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment