Sunday, 27 August 2017

Sanhedrin 41: Forewarnings, Hesitancies to Put a Person to Death

More commentary on our last Mishna:
  • ·      Proofs for requiring forewarnings: how to manage intentionality
  • ·      Measuring different types of crimes and their punishments
  • ·      When a person understands the risk, s/he releases him/herself to death
    • o  Conspiring witnesses who testify that a betrothed woman committed adultery should not be put to death (the same punishment as her) for they did not forewarn her; they testified not to execute her but to save her husband from transgressing
  • ·      Significant testimony: valuating incongruent testimony from witnesses
    • oCommenting on the stem of a fig when the crime was picking a fig on Shabbat is significant
    • o   The colour of a sandal is not significant unless the crime was killing another person with that sandal
  • ·      Rabban Yochanan ben Zakkai could not have judged a capital crime because he was a leader regarding Torah commemoration, which dates his years as a judge
  • ·      Differences between interrogation and examination: some testimony can be rendered conspiratory testimony and some cannot
  • ·      When there is a discrepancy between witness reports about the day of the month
  • ·      For how many days into a new month are we permitted to say the blessing on the new month?  Up until 7 days?  16 days?


No comments:

Post a Comment