- the rabbis argue about the source behind the recent teaching that a borrower is liable for theft of loss of a borrowed item
- the rabbis argue about the source behind the teaching about negligence with the owner in the case of a damaged item in another person's care
- the rabbis argue about the definition of yesterday's teaching about liability when 'the owner is with him'
- the rabbis argue about whether or not a person is liable in specific cases, like when a woman damages an item that she is caring for in her husband's presence
I began Daf Yomi (Koren translation) in August of 2012 with the help of an online group that is now defunct. This blog is intended to help me structure and focus my thoughts as I grapple with the text. I am happy to connect with others who are interested in the social and halachic implications of our oral tradition. Respectful input is welcome.
Sunday, 1 January 2017
Bava Metzia 95: Sources and Reasons Regarding Liability Rules
Some very brief notes about today's daf:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment